↓ Skip to main content

Discordance between sexual behavior and self-reported sexual identity: a population-based survey of New York City men.

Overview of attention for article published in Annals of Internal Medicine, September 2006
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (84th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
6 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
policy
2 policy sources
twitter
1 X user
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
reddit
6 Redditors

Readers on

mendeley
134 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Discordance between sexual behavior and self-reported sexual identity: a population-based survey of New York City men.
Published in
Annals of Internal Medicine, September 2006
DOI 10.7326/0003-4819-145-6-200609190-00005
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Persons reporting sexual identity that is discordant with their sexual behavior may engage in riskier sexual behaviors than those with concordant identity and behavior. The former group could play an important role in the spread of sexually transmitted diseases.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 134 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 6 4%
United Kingdom 2 1%
Romania 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Guatemala 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 119 89%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 29 22%
Student > Master 20 15%
Researcher 18 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 15 11%
Other 9 7%
Other 26 19%
Unknown 17 13%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 34 25%
Psychology 30 22%
Medicine and Dentistry 26 19%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 3%
Other 13 10%
Unknown 22 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 64. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 August 2024.
All research outputs
#838,829
of 34,365,356 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Internal Medicine
#2,575
of 16,861 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,305
of 125,061 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Internal Medicine
#7
of 46 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,365,356 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 16,861 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 59.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 125,061 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 46 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.