↓ Skip to main content

Communication skills teaching in Brazilian medical schools: What lessons can be learned?

Overview of attention for article published in Patient Education & Counseling, December 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
69 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Communication skills teaching in Brazilian medical schools: What lessons can be learned?
Published in
Patient Education & Counseling, December 2017
DOI 10.1016/j.pec.2017.12.021
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

To assess current practices in communication skills (CS) teaching in Brazilian medical schools (MS), looking for similarities and differences with other countries. This study was performed with 162 out of the 237 accredited Brazilian MS (68.35%). The quantitative data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and qualitative data using content analysis. 104 MS (64.2%) reported formal CS training. CS were more commonly taught in the pre-clinical years, by physicians and psychologists. Compared to other countries, Brazil was unique in offering training for "acolhimento" ("embracement"), which is a Brazilian Government strategy that requires that all those connected with healthcare delivery, from administrators to practitioners, and all allied health personnel "embrace" a dedication to caring for patients and the communities in which they live. Formal CS teaching in Brazilian MS is less frequently seen in MS curriculum compared to reported data from other countries. The CS teaching of "embracement" is unique to Brazil. This study adds to the literature by identifying the CS teaching of "embracement" in Brazilian MS, which could be considered outside Brazil.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 69 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 69 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 11 16%
Student > Bachelor 9 13%
Researcher 6 9%
Professor 4 6%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 6%
Other 13 19%
Unknown 22 32%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 15 22%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 9%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 5 7%
Social Sciences 5 7%
Business, Management and Accounting 3 4%
Other 11 16%
Unknown 24 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 May 2018.
All research outputs
#31,195,265
of 34,376,207 outputs
Outputs from Patient Education & Counseling
#4,276
of 4,783 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#440,737
of 495,260 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Patient Education & Counseling
#44
of 65 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,376,207 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,783 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 495,260 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 65 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.