↓ Skip to main content

Cooperative development of logical modelling standards and tools with CoLoMoTo

Overview of attention for article published in Bioinformatics, January 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (85th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (70th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
14 X users
wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages

Readers on

mendeley
91 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Cooperative development of logical modelling standards and tools with CoLoMoTo
Published in
Bioinformatics, January 2015
DOI 10.1093/bioinformatics/btv013
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

The identification of large regulatory and signalling networks involved in the control of crucial cellular processes calls for proper modelling approaches. Indeed, models can help elucidate properties of these networks, understand their behaviour, and provide (testable) predictions by performing in silico experiments. In this context, qualitative, logical frameworks have emerged as relevant approaches, as demonstrated by a growing number of published models, along with new methodologies and software tools. This productive activity now requires a concerted effort to ensure model reusability and interoperability between tools. Following an outline of the logical modelling framework, we present the most important achievements of the Consortium for Logical Modelling and Tools, along with future objectives. Our aim is to advertise this open community, which welcomes contributions from all researchers interested in logical modelling or in related mathematical and computational developments.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 91 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
France 2 2%
United States 1 1%
Portugal 1 1%
Latvia 1 1%
United Kingdom 1 1%
Unknown 85 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 23 25%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 15%
Student > Master 12 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 9%
Student > Bachelor 7 8%
Other 14 15%
Unknown 13 14%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 28 31%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 19 21%
Computer Science 14 15%
Engineering 5 5%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 4%
Other 7 8%
Unknown 14 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 July 2026.
All research outputs
#4,128,673
of 29,034,465 outputs
Outputs from Bioinformatics
#3,246
of 13,385 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#51,173
of 372,813 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Bioinformatics
#57
of 193 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 29,034,465 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,385 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 372,813 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 193 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.