↓ Skip to main content

Subscapularis Tendon Tear Classification Based on 3‐Dimensional Anatomic Footprint: A Cadaveric and Prospective Clinical Observational Study

Overview of attention for article published in Arthroscopy: The Journal of Arthroscopic & Related Surgery, October 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (69th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (65th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
7 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
98 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Subscapularis Tendon Tear Classification Based on 3‐Dimensional Anatomic Footprint: A Cadaveric and Prospective Clinical Observational Study
Published in
Arthroscopy: The Journal of Arthroscopic & Related Surgery, October 2014
DOI 10.1016/j.arthro.2014.08.015
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

The purpose of this study was to define the subscapularis tendon footprint anatomy in 3-dimensional (3D) perspective, report the incidence of tears, and classify the tear patterns prospectively during shoulder arthroscopic surgery.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 98 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Spain 1 1%
Unknown 97 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Postgraduate 11 11%
Student > Bachelor 10 10%
Researcher 10 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 7%
Other 21 21%
Unknown 30 31%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 44 45%
Sports and Recreations 6 6%
Engineering 4 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 1%
Other 3 3%
Unknown 37 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 December 2015.
All research outputs
#10,442,960
of 34,410,315 outputs
Outputs from Arthroscopy: The Journal of Arthroscopic & Related Surgery
#1,994
of 5,199 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#92,450
of 305,877 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Arthroscopy: The Journal of Arthroscopic & Related Surgery
#16
of 46 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,410,315 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,199 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 305,877 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 46 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.