↓ Skip to main content

Significant Chondrocyte Viability Is Present in Acetabular Chondral Flaps Associated With Femoroacetabular Impingement

Overview of attention for article published in The American Journal of Sports Medicine, October 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (71st percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
7 X users

Readers on

mendeley
41 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Significant Chondrocyte Viability Is Present in Acetabular Chondral Flaps Associated With Femoroacetabular Impingement
Published in
The American Journal of Sports Medicine, October 2017
DOI 10.1177/0363546517732751
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Patients presenting with cam deformity of the femoral head and neck sustain repeated trauma to the articular cartilage of the superior acetabulum, with chondral delamination injuries found during hip arthroscopy. Two previous studies reveal conflicting chondrocyte viability data in these traumatic cartilage injuries. The full-thickness nature of flaps may suggest that chondrocytes residing in the cartilage flap matrix in the joint environment would remain viable despite shear trauma. Hypothesis/Purpose: The purpose of this study is to determine the in vivo tissue viability of acetabular chondral flaps in patients with femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) when samples are analyzed immediately after biopsy. We hypothesize that the majority of the tissue in acetabular chondral flaps is viable in the joint microenvironment. Descriptive laboratory study. Partially detached cartilage flaps from 10 patients undergoing arthroscopic hip surgery for FAI were biopsied in a minimally traumatic manner before chondroplasty and microfracture. Samples were placed in cold Hank's Balanced Salt Solution without phenol red solution and immediately transported on ice to our laboratory. The edge of the samples was trimmed and further cut into 3 separate, 1-mm-thick sections. Sections were stained using a live/dead staining kit. Images were obtained with confocal microscopy, and the percentage of live cells was quantified. Patients averaged 36 ± 11 years (range, 18-48 years), and 2 patients were female. The mean body mass index was 28.9 ± 5.6 kg/m(2). The total proportion of live cells from all sections analyzed was 85.8%. The proportion of live cells per patient was 87% ± 10%. We determined that acetabular chondral flaps are approximately 87% live cells when analyzed immediately after biopsy, with 6 of 10 patients having greater than 90% live cells. These data point to the importance of laboratory techniques in making viability judgments in biologic systems. Full-thickness cartilage loss is a difficult problem for all active people but particularly in the young population in whom joint preservation is key. We describe the viability of chondrocytes present in full-thickness acetabular-based chondral flaps encountered during hip arthroscopy. Identification of greater than 85% chondrocyte viability supports a foundation for evaluation and creation of novel clinical innovations for repair and replacement techniques using the flap as donor tissue, as alternatives to chondroplasty and microfracture.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 41 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 41 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 6 15%
Researcher 6 15%
Other 5 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 7%
Other 9 22%
Unknown 8 20%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 25 61%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 10%
Sports and Recreations 2 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 2%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 2%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 7 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 December 2017.
All research outputs
#5,713,232
of 23,015,156 outputs
Outputs from The American Journal of Sports Medicine
#2,527
of 5,408 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#91,844
of 324,819 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The American Journal of Sports Medicine
#245
of 620 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,015,156 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,408 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 324,819 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 620 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.