↓ Skip to main content

The effects of transcription and recombination on mutational dynamics of short tandem repeats

Overview of attention for article published in Nucleic Acids Research, December 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Readers on

mendeley
41 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
The effects of transcription and recombination on mutational dynamics of short tandem repeats
Published in
Nucleic Acids Research, December 2017
DOI 10.1093/nar/gkx1253
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Short tandem repeats (STR) are ubiquitous components of the genomic architecture of most living organisms. Recent work has highlighted the widespread functional significance of such repeats, particularly around gene regulation, but the mutational processes underlying the evolution of these highly abundant and highly variable sequences are not fully understood. Traditional models assume that strand misalignment during replication is the predominant mechanism, but empirical data suggest the involvement of other processes including recombination and transcription. Despite this evidence, the relative influences of these processes have not previously been tested experimentally on a genome-wide scale. Using deep sequencing, we identify mutations at >200 microsatellites, across 700 generations in replicated populations of two otherwise identical sexual and asexual Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains. Using generalized linear models, we investigate correlates of STR mutability including the nature of the mutation, STR composition and contextual factors including recombination, transcription and replication origins. Sexual capability was not a significant predictor of microsatellite mutability, but, intriguingly, we identify transcription as a significant positive predictor. We also find that STR density is substantially increased in regions neighboring, but not within, recombination hotspots.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 41 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 41 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 22%
Researcher 8 20%
Student > Master 5 12%
Student > Bachelor 4 10%
Professor 3 7%
Other 5 12%
Unknown 7 17%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 17 41%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 24%
Philosophy 1 2%
Mathematics 1 2%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 2%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 10 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 February 2018.
All research outputs
#16,283,765
of 27,788,586 outputs
Outputs from Nucleic Acids Research
#22,195
of 28,768 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#233,305
of 456,756 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nucleic Acids Research
#171
of 267 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 27,788,586 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 28,768 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.4. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 456,756 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 267 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.