Title |
Convergent evolution of the genomes of marine mammals
|
---|---|
Published in |
Nature Genetics, January 2015
|
DOI | 10.1038/ng.3198 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Andrew D Foote, Yue Liu, Gregg W C Thomas, Tomáš Vinař, Jessica Alföldi, Jixin Deng, Shannon Dugan, Cornelis E van Elk, Margaret E Hunter, Vandita Joshi, Ziad Khan, Christie Kovar, Sandra L Lee, Kerstin Lindblad-Toh, Annalaura Mancia, Rasmus Nielsen, Xiang Qin, Jiaxin Qu, Brian J Raney, Nagarjun Vijay, Jochen B W Wolf, Matthew W Hahn, Donna M Muzny, Kim C Worley, M Thomas P Gilbert, Richard A Gibbs |
Abstract |
Marine mammals from different mammalian orders share several phenotypic traits adapted to the aquatic environment and therefore represent a classic example of convergent evolution. To investigate convergent evolution at the genomic level, we sequenced and performed de novo assembly of the genomes of three species of marine mammals (the killer whale, walrus and manatee) from three mammalian orders that share independently evolved phenotypic adaptations to a marine existence. Our comparative genomic analyses found that convergent amino acid substitutions were widespread throughout the genome and that a subset of these substitutions were in genes evolving under positive selection and putatively associated with a marine phenotype. However, we found higher levels of convergent amino acid substitutions in a control set of terrestrial sister taxa to the marine mammals. Our results suggest that, whereas convergent molecular evolution is relatively common, adaptive molecular convergence linked to phenotypic convergence is comparatively rare. |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 44 | 24% |
Spain | 9 | 5% |
United Kingdom | 9 | 5% |
India | 5 | 3% |
Sweden | 4 | 2% |
Canada | 4 | 2% |
Germany | 3 | 2% |
France | 3 | 2% |
Netherlands | 3 | 2% |
Other | 26 | 14% |
Unknown | 75 | 41% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 109 | 59% |
Scientists | 68 | 37% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 2% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 4 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 20 | 2% |
Brazil | 5 | <1% |
Japan | 3 | <1% |
France | 2 | <1% |
Saudi Arabia | 2 | <1% |
Sweden | 2 | <1% |
Chile | 1 | <1% |
Bulgaria | 1 | <1% |
Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
Other | 12 | 1% |
Unknown | 800 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 205 | 24% |
Researcher | 134 | 16% |
Student > Master | 122 | 14% |
Student > Bachelor | 105 | 12% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 44 | 5% |
Other | 128 | 15% |
Unknown | 111 | 13% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 424 | 50% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 169 | 20% |
Environmental Science | 42 | 5% |
Computer Science | 17 | 2% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 11 | 1% |
Other | 55 | 6% |
Unknown | 131 | 15% |