↓ Skip to main content

Polarizable Molecular Dynamics in a Polarizable Continuum Solvent

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation, January 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
58 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Polarizable Molecular Dynamics in a Polarizable Continuum Solvent
Published in
Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation, January 2015
DOI 10.1021/ct500998q
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

We present for the first time scalable polarizable molecular dynamics (MD) simulations within a polarizable continuum solvent with molecular shape cavities and exact solution of the mutual polarization. The key ingredients are a very efficient algorithm for solving the equations associated with the polarizable continuum, in particular, the domain decomposition Conductor-like Screening Model (ddCOSMO), a rigorous coupling of the continuum with the polarizable force field achieved through a robust variational formulation and an effective strategy to solve the coupled equations. The coupling of ddCOSMO with non variational force fields, including AMOEBA, is also addressed. The MD simulations are feasible, for real life systems, on standard cluster nodes; a scalable parallel implementation allows for further speed up in the context of a newly developed module in Tinker, named Tinker-HP. NVE simulations are stable and long term energy conservation can be achieved. This paper is focused on the methodological developments, on the analysis of the algorithm and on the stability of the simulations; a proof-of-concept application is also presented to attest the possibilities of this newly developed technique.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 58 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 1 2%
Portugal 1 2%
Italy 1 2%
France 1 2%
Germany 1 2%
Unknown 53 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 17 29%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 24%
Student > Bachelor 5 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 5 9%
Student > Master 4 7%
Other 7 12%
Unknown 6 10%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 32 55%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 5%
Physics and Astronomy 3 5%
Engineering 3 5%
Other 3 5%
Unknown 10 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 January 2015.
All research outputs
#20,251,039
of 22,780,165 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation
#6,001
of 6,723 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#296,072
of 352,182 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation
#113
of 142 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,780,165 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,723 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 352,182 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 142 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.