↓ Skip to main content

Cerebrovascular hemodynamics in fetuses with congenital heart disease

Overview of attention for article published in Echocardiography, December 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
46 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Cerebrovascular hemodynamics in fetuses with congenital heart disease
Published in
Echocardiography, December 2017
DOI 10.1111/echo.13572
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

It is hypothesized that diminished cerebral vascular resistance or the "brain sparing effect" is associated with fetuses with complex congenital heart defects (CHD) and may affect their neurodevelopmental outcome. An alternative explanation is that it is related to the location, cardiac output, pressure, and resistance in left heart obstructive CHDs. We sought to determine the effects of various left and right heart obstructive defects on the cerebral and placental hemodynamics and to evaluate the utility of these variables for the assessment and prognosis of CHDs. A total of 290 fetal echocardiograms were reviewed, including 91 fetuses with CHD and 199 normal ones. The CHD fetuses were divided into four groups, that is, left-sided obstructive lesions (LSOL), hypoplastic left heart syndrome (HLHS), right-sided obstructive lesions (RSOL), and hypoplastic right heart syndrome (HRHS). The pulsatility index of middle cerebral artery (MCA-PI) and umbilical artery (UA-PI) were measured by pulse-wave Doppler, and their Z scores were also derived. Cerebroplacental ratio (CPR) was calculated as: CPR=MCA-PI/UA-PI. There was no significant difference in MCA-PI between the 4 CHD and normal control groups (P>.05). However, MCA-PI and Z score decreased in aortic stenosis but not in interrupted aortic arch or coarctation subgroups, whereas they increased in pulmonary atresia but not pulmonary stenosis or tetralogy of Fallot subgroups compared with normal group (P<.05). There was no significant difference in CPR between any study group or subgroup and normal control group. Our study suggests MCA-PI is lower in aortic stenosis and high in pulmonary atresia but not significantly different in other LSOL, HLHS, RSOL, and HRHS. MCA-PI regulation in CHD is probably more associated with left and right outflow obstruction, location of the obstruction, and hemodynamics rather than "brain sparing effect" or preferential shunting of blood to the fetal brain, heart, and adrenals in the stressed fetus (eg, IUGR). CPR may not be a sensitive measure for the effect of CHDs and their severity on cerebral and placental circulation.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 46 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 46 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 6 13%
Student > Bachelor 4 9%
Student > Master 4 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 7%
Librarian 1 2%
Other 6 13%
Unknown 22 48%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 17 37%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 4%
Engineering 2 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 2%
Neuroscience 1 2%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 23 50%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 December 2017.
All research outputs
#19,955,316
of 24,525,936 outputs
Outputs from Echocardiography
#715
of 1,095 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#340,848
of 451,503 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Echocardiography
#12
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,525,936 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,095 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.9. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 451,503 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.