You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Future land‐use scenarios and the loss of wildlife habitats in the southeastern United States
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Ecological Applications, January 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1890/13-2078.1 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Sebastián Martinuzzi, John C. Withey, Anna M. Pidgeon, Andrew J. Plantinga, Alexa J. McKerrow, Steven G. Williams, David P. Helmers, Volker C. Radeloff |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 145 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 2% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| China | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 139 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 32 | 22% |
| Student > Master | 21 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 20 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 14 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 8 | 6% |
| Other | 18 | 12% |
| Unknown | 32 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 48 | 33% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 44 | 30% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 5 | 3% |
| Engineering | 3 | 2% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 1% |
| Other | 6 | 4% |
| Unknown | 37 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 January 2015.
All research outputs
#18,390,814
of 22,780,165 outputs
Outputs from Ecological Applications
#2,944
of 3,177 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#255,698
of 352,944 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ecological Applications
#26
of 33 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,780,165 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,177 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.2. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 352,944 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 33 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.