↓ Skip to main content

Pediatric Toxic Epidermal Necrolysis

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of burn care & research, January 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (53rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
41 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Pediatric Toxic Epidermal Necrolysis
Published in
Journal of burn care & research, January 2015
DOI 10.1097/bcr.0000000000000204
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN) and Stevens-Johnson Syndrome (SJS) are rare yet severe exfoliative skin disorders. The authors examined the efficacy of predictive models for their use as prognostic indicators in pediatric SJS or TEN. Over a 15-year period, 41 patients ≤18 years of age were identified and reviewed. Predictive models compared retrospectively to the observed mortality in the population included: SCORTEN (Score of Toxic Epidermal Necrolysis), Pediatric Index of Mortality 2, Pediatric Risk of Mortality III-24, and Abbreviated Burn Severity Index. Correlation coefficients and 95% confidence intervals were calculated for the following: acute hospital length of stay, days until wound closure, days of mechanical ventilation, number of infectious complications, and number of acute operative procedures. When calculated within the first 24 hours of admission, the four models predicted low rates of mortality, approaching our 0% observed mortality, and also demonstrated a significant correlation between higher scores and the five chosen indicators of morbidity (P < .05). SCORTEN on day 3 of admission was statistically significant (P < .05) only when predicting the number of infectious complications and days of mechanical ventilation and was therefore felt to be less predictive than use of SCORTEN on admission. When calculated within the first day of admission of pediatric SJS or TEN patients, SCORTEN, Abbreviated Burn Severity Index, Pediatric Index of Mortality 2, and Pediatric Risk of Mortality III all significantly predict acute morbidity. This is the first time scoring systems have been assessed for their ability to predict mortality and morbidity in pediatric SJS or TEN despite its widely recognized, severe acute course of disease.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 41 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 41 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 17%
Student > Master 6 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 10%
Student > Bachelor 4 10%
Researcher 3 7%
Other 6 15%
Unknown 11 27%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 22 54%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 2%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 2%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 2%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 2%
Other 2 5%
Unknown 13 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 September 2015.
All research outputs
#23,235,214
of 34,361,833 outputs
Outputs from Journal of burn care & research
#1,001
of 2,093 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#263,699
of 409,688 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of burn care & research
#58
of 134 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,361,833 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,093 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 409,688 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 134 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.