↓ Skip to main content

Embryo transfer practices and multiple births resulting from assisted reproductive technology: an opportunity for prevention

Overview of attention for article published in Fertility & Sterility, January 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source
twitter
1 X user
facebook
2 Facebook pages
guideline
1 clinical guideline source

Readers on

mendeley
75 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Embryo transfer practices and multiple births resulting from assisted reproductive technology: an opportunity for prevention
Published in
Fertility & Sterility, January 2015
DOI 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2014.12.127
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

To evaluate assisted reproductive technology (ART) ET practices in the United States and assess the impact of these practices on multiple births, which pose health risks for both mothers and infants.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 75 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Indonesia 1 1%
Unknown 74 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 16 21%
Other 8 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 11%
Researcher 6 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 5%
Other 9 12%
Unknown 24 32%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 21 28%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 12%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 4%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 2 3%
Other 9 12%
Unknown 25 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 May 2024.
All research outputs
#3,284,653
of 34,360,257 outputs
Outputs from Fertility & Sterility
#1,553
of 12,467 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#37,246
of 409,530 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Fertility & Sterility
#12
of 130 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,360,257 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,467 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 409,530 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 130 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.