↓ Skip to main content

Well‐Defined Heterobimetallic Reactivity at Unsupported Ruthenium–Indium Bonds

Overview of attention for article published in Chemistry - A European Journal, January 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
20 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Well‐Defined Heterobimetallic Reactivity at Unsupported Ruthenium–Indium Bonds
Published in
Chemistry - A European Journal, January 2018
DOI 10.1002/chem.201705796
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

The hydride complex [Ru(IPr)2(CO)H][BArF4], 1, reacts with InMe3 with loss of CH4 to form [Ru(IPr)2(CO)(InMe)(Me)][BArF4], 4, featuring an unsupported Ru-In bond with unsaturated Ru and In centres. 4 reacts with H2 to give [Ru(IPr)2(CO)(eta2-H2)(InMe)(H)][BArF4], 5, while CO induces formation of the indyl complex [Ru(IPr)2(CO)3(InMe2)][BArF4], 7. These observations highlight the ability of Me to shuttle between Ru and In centres and are supported by DFT calculations on the mechanism of formation of 4 and its reactions with H2 and CO. An analysis of Ru-In bonding in these species is also presented. Reaction of 1 with GaMe3 also involves CH4 loss but, in contrast to its In congener, sees IPr transfer from Ru to Ga to give a gallyl complex featuring an eta6 interaction of one aryl substituent with Ru.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 20 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 20 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 20%
Student > Bachelor 3 15%
Student > Master 3 15%
Researcher 3 15%
Lecturer 1 5%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 6 30%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 13 65%
Unknown 7 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 January 2018.
All research outputs
#27,738,494
of 34,376,207 outputs
Outputs from Chemistry - A European Journal
#21,380
of 29,578 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#381,736
of 496,992 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Chemistry - A European Journal
#400
of 730 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,376,207 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 29,578 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 496,992 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 730 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.