↓ Skip to main content

Generalizable representations of pain, cognitive control, and negative emotion in medial frontal cortex

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Neuroscience, January 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
177 X users
patent
1 patent
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
414 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Generalizable representations of pain, cognitive control, and negative emotion in medial frontal cortex
Published in
Nature Neuroscience, January 2018
DOI 10.1038/s41593-017-0051-7
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

The medial frontal cortex, including anterior midcingulate cortex, has been linked to multiple psychological domains, including cognitive control, pain, and emotion. However, it is unclear whether this region encodes representations of these domains that are generalizable across studies and subdomains. Additionally, if there are generalizable representations, do they reflect a single underlying process shared across domains or multiple domain-specific processes? We decomposed multivariate patterns of functional MRI activity from 270 participants across 18 studies into study-specific, subdomain-specific, and domain-specific components and identified latent multivariate representations that generalized across subdomains but were specific to each domain. Pain representations were localized to anterior midcingulate cortex, negative emotion representations to ventromedial prefrontal cortex, and cognitive control representations to portions of the dorsal midcingulate. These findings provide evidence for medial frontal cortex representations that generalize across studies and subdomains but are specific to distinct psychological domains rather than reducible to a single underlying process.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 177 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 414 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 414 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 92 22%
Researcher 64 15%
Student > Master 49 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 30 7%
Student > Bachelor 27 7%
Other 64 15%
Unknown 88 21%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 112 27%
Neuroscience 103 25%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 23 6%
Medicine and Dentistry 14 3%
Engineering 9 2%
Other 34 8%
Unknown 119 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 101. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 May 2026.
All research outputs
#524,515
of 34,190,942 outputs
Outputs from Nature Neuroscience
#935
of 6,482 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,317
of 495,733 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Neuroscience
#16
of 65 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,190,942 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,482 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 61.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 495,733 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 65 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.