↓ Skip to main content
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
41 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Familial and Somatic BAP1 Mutations Inactivate ASXL1/2-Mediated Allosteric Regulation of BAP1 Deubiquitinase by Targeting Multiple Independent Domains
Published in
Cancer Research, February 2018
DOI 10.1158/0008-5472.can-17-2876
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Deleterious mutations of the ubiquitin carboxy-terminal hydrolase BAP1 found in cancers are predicted to encode inactive truncated proteins, suggesting that loss of enzyme function is a primary tumorigenic mechanism. However, many tumors exhibit missense mutations or in-frame deletions or insertions, often outside the functionally critical UCH domain in this tumor suppressor protein. Thus, precisely how these mutations inactivate BAP1 is unknown. Here, we show how these mutations affect BAP1 interactions with the Polycomb group-like protein ASXL2, using combinations of computational modeling technology, molecular biology, and in vitro reconstitution biochemistry. We found that the BAP1-ASXL2 interaction is direct and high affinity, occurring through the ASXH domain of ASXL2, an obligate partner for BAP1 enzymatic activity. The ASXH domain was the minimal domain for binding the BAP1 ULD domain, and mutations on the surfaces of predicted helices of ASXH abolished BAP1 association and stimulation of BAP1 enzymatic activity. The BAP1-UCH, BAP1-ULD, and ASXH domains formed a cooperative stable ternary complex required for deubiquitination. We defined four classes of alterations in BAP1 outside the UCH domain, each failing to productively recruit ASXH to the wild-type BAP1 catalytic site via the ULD, resulting in loss of BAP1 ubiquitin hydrolase activity. Our results indicate that many BAP1 mutations act allosterically to inhibit ASXH binding, thereby leading to loss of enzyme activity. Small molecule approaches to reactivate latent wild-type UCH activity of these mutants might be therapeutically viable.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 41 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 41 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 12 29%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 20%
Student > Bachelor 3 7%
Professor 3 7%
Student > Master 3 7%
Other 5 12%
Unknown 7 17%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 16 39%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 15%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 10%
Neuroscience 2 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 2%
Other 4 10%
Unknown 8 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 January 2018.
All research outputs
#27,693,281
of 34,350,842 outputs
Outputs from Cancer Research
#33,034
of 35,807 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#288,201
of 372,923 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cancer Research
#189
of 215 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,350,842 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 35,807 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.7. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 372,923 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 215 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.