↓ Skip to main content

NET EMISSIONS OF CH4 AND CO2 IN ALASKA: IMPLICATIONS FOR THE REGION'S GREENHOUSE GAS BUDGET

Overview of attention for article published in Ecological Applications, January 2007
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
3 policy sources
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
77 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
98 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
NET EMISSIONS OF CH4 AND CO2 IN ALASKA: IMPLICATIONS FOR THE REGION'S GREENHOUSE GAS BUDGET
Published in
Ecological Applications, January 2007
DOI 10.1890/1051-0761(2007)017[0203:neocac]2.0.co;2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Q. Zhuang, J. M. Melillo, A. D. McGuire, D. W. Kicklighter, R. G. Prinn, P. A. Steudler, B. S. Felzer, S. Hu

Abstract

We used a biogeochemistry model, the Terrestrial Ecosystem Model (TEM), to study the net methane (CH4) fluxes between Alaskan ecosystems and the atmosphere. We estimated that the current net emissions of CH4 (emissions minus consumption) from Alaskan soils are approximately 3 Tg CH4/yr. Wet tundra ecosystems are responsible for 75% of the region's net emissions, while dry tundra and upland boreal forests are responsible for 50% and 45% of total consumption over the region, respectively. In response to climate change over the 21st century, our simulations indicated that CH4 emissions from wet soils would be enhanced more than consumption by dry soils of tundra and boreal forests. As a consequence, we projected that net CH4 emissions will almost double by the end of the century in response to high-latitude warming and associated climate changes. When we placed these CH4 emissions in the context of the projected carbon budget (carbon dioxide [CO2] and CH4) for Alaska at the end of the 21st century, we estimated that Alaska will be a net source of greenhouse gases to the atmosphere of 69 Tg CO2 equivalents/yr, that is, a balance between net methane emissions of 131 Tg CO2 equivalents/yr and carbon sequestration of 17 Tg C/yr (62 Tg CO2 equivalents/yr).

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 98 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 5 5%
United Kingdom 2 2%
Switzerland 1 1%
Australia 1 1%
Japan 1 1%
China 1 1%
Unknown 87 89%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 30 31%
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 20%
Student > Master 10 10%
Professor 9 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 6 6%
Other 16 16%
Unknown 7 7%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 42 43%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 20 20%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 14 14%
Social Sciences 3 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 2%
Other 3 3%
Unknown 14 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 January 2015.
All research outputs
#2,951,474
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Ecological Applications
#779
of 3,531 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,207
of 173,355 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ecological Applications
#3
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,531 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 173,355 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.