↓ Skip to main content

Road crossing structures for amphibians and reptiles: Informing design through behavioral analysis

Overview of attention for article published in Biological Conservation, November 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (70th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (51st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users
wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages

Readers on

mendeley
283 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Road crossing structures for amphibians and reptiles: Informing design through behavioral analysis
Published in
Biological Conservation, November 2008
DOI 10.1016/j.biocon.2008.08.010
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 283 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 8 3%
Spain 3 1%
Canada 2 <1%
Austria 2 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Unknown 266 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 52 18%
Student > Master 50 18%
Student > Bachelor 39 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 35 12%
Other 29 10%
Other 38 13%
Unknown 40 14%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 135 48%
Environmental Science 81 29%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 6 2%
Social Sciences 4 1%
Engineering 3 1%
Other 10 4%
Unknown 44 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 May 2019.
All research outputs
#6,469,499
of 29,858,747 outputs
Outputs from Biological Conservation
#3,632
of 7,691 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,441
of 120,730 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biological Conservation
#12
of 33 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 29,858,747 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,691 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 24.3. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 120,730 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 33 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.