↓ Skip to main content

Using DNA strand displacement to control interactions in DNA-grafted colloids

Overview of attention for article published in Soft Matter, January 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
62 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Using DNA strand displacement to control interactions in DNA-grafted colloids
Published in
Soft Matter, January 2018
DOI 10.1039/c7sm01722g
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Grafting DNA oligonucleotides to colloidal particles leads to specific, reversible interactions between those particles. However, the interaction strength varies steeply and monotonically with temperature, hindering the use of DNA-mediated interactions in self-assembly. We show how the dependence on temperature can be modified in a controlled way by incorporating DNA strand-displacement reactions. The method allows us to make multicomponent systems that can self-assemble over a wide range of temperatures, invert the dependence on temperature to design colloidal systems that melt upon cooling, controllably transition between structures with different compositions, or design systems with multiple melting transitions. This wide range of behaviors can be realized simply by adding a small number of DNA strands to the solution, making the approach modular and straightforward to implement. We conclude with practical considerations for designing systems of DNA-mediated colloidal interactions.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 62 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 62 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 26%
Researcher 12 19%
Professor 8 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 6%
Student > Master 4 6%
Other 8 13%
Unknown 10 16%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Physics and Astronomy 16 26%
Chemistry 11 18%
Chemical Engineering 7 11%
Engineering 7 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 8%
Other 4 6%
Unknown 12 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 January 2018.
All research outputs
#27,205,565
of 32,950,213 outputs
Outputs from Soft Matter
#6,379
of 8,630 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#380,882
of 482,276 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Soft Matter
#537
of 768 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 32,950,213 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,630 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 482,276 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 768 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.