↓ Skip to main content

Is Longer Treatment Better? A Comparison Study of 3 Versus 6 Months Cognitive Remediation in Schizophrenia

Overview of attention for article published in Neuropsychology, May 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
95 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Is Longer Treatment Better? A Comparison Study of 3 Versus 6 Months Cognitive Remediation in Schizophrenia
Published in
Neuropsychology, May 2017
DOI 10.1037/neu0000347
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Despite its extensive use for treating cognitive deficits in schizophrenia, computer-assisted cognitive remediation (CACR) currently lacks a standardized protocol. Duration is an important feature to be defined, as it may contribute to heterogeneous outcome. This study compares 2 treatment durations, 3 versus 6 months, to analyze their effects on both cognition and daily functioning. Fifty-seven outpatients with schizophrenia received 3 months of CACR and 41 received 6 months of CACR. All patients were assessed at baseline and after 3 and 6 months with the Brief Assessment for Cognition in Schizophrenia and with the Quality of Life Scale (QLS). Repeated measures ANOVA showed significant improvements in all cognitive domains after 3 months. A significant effect of treatment duration was observed only for executive functions, with significantly higher scores among patients treated for 6 months. Significant improvements in QLS were also observed after 6 months in both groups, with a significant time by treatment interaction for QLS Total Score. Results confirm the efficacy of 3-months CACR in terms of both cognitive and functional improvements, suggesting that an extended intervention may lead to further benefits in executive functions and daily functioning. (PsycINFO Database Record

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 95 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 1 1%
Unknown 94 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 13 14%
Student > Bachelor 11 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 9%
Researcher 9 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 8%
Other 18 19%
Unknown 27 28%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 39 41%
Medicine and Dentistry 10 11%
Neuroscience 7 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 5%
Environmental Science 1 1%
Other 3 3%
Unknown 30 32%