↓ Skip to main content

Instruments for Evaluating Education in Evidence-Based Practice: A Systematic Review

Overview of attention for article published in JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association, September 2006
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (77th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Readers on

mendeley
373 Mendeley
citeulike
6 CiteULike
connotea
2 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Instruments for Evaluating Education in Evidence-Based Practice: A Systematic Review
Published in
JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association, September 2006
DOI 10.1001/jama.296.9.1116
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Evidence-based practice (EBP) is the integration of the best research evidence with patients' values and clinical circumstances in clinical decision making. Teaching of EBP should be evaluated and guided by evidence of its own effectiveness.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 373 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 7 2%
Spain 3 <1%
Brazil 2 <1%
Australia 2 <1%
Saudi Arabia 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Korea, Republic of 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Other 2 <1%
Unknown 352 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 45 12%
Student > Master 38 10%
Researcher 36 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 29 8%
Professor 27 7%
Other 128 34%
Unknown 70 19%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 115 31%
Nursing and Health Professions 45 12%
Social Sciences 35 9%
Psychology 35 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 2%
Other 49 13%
Unknown 85 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 February 2024.
All research outputs
#7,488,822
of 34,518,147 outputs
Outputs from JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association
#23,506
of 42,538 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,293
of 124,541 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association
#80
of 130 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,518,147 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 78th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 42,538 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 73.0. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 124,541 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 130 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.