↓ Skip to main content

Rodent Ultrasonic Short Calls: Locomotion, Biomechanics, and Communication

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Comparative Psychology, January 1992
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (75th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
9 Wikipedia pages
reddit
1 Redditor

Readers on

mendeley
61 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Rodent Ultrasonic Short Calls: Locomotion, Biomechanics, and Communication
Published in
Journal of Comparative Psychology, January 1992
DOI 10.1037/0735-7036.106.4.360
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Rodents of many species emit short ultrasonic vocalizations during copulation, aggression, and other activities. Thiessen and Kittrell (1979) hypothesized that ultrasound emission by gerbils is the acoustic by-product of physical compression of the thorax during certain locomotor behaviors. I carry this hypothesis further by relating gerbil ultrasound to the biomechanics of respiration during locomotion. I also suggest that at least some of the ultrasonic emissions of other rodent species are, like the gerbil's, by-products of thoracic compression during locomotion. Support for this suggestion comes from descriptions in the literature of ultrasound emission as well as slow-motion analysis of rat copulatory behavior. Finally, this alternative view of rodent ultrasound has consequences for the interpretation of experimental findings in ultrasound research and for the understanding of messages and meanings in rodent communication.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 61 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Brazil 2 3%
Mexico 1 2%
Hungary 1 2%
Unknown 57 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 26%
Researcher 14 23%
Student > Bachelor 11 18%
Student > Master 9 15%
Other 2 3%
Other 4 7%
Unknown 5 8%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 22 36%
Psychology 10 16%
Neuroscience 8 13%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 7%
Arts and Humanities 2 3%
Other 6 10%
Unknown 9 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 May 2026.
All research outputs
#10,953,585
of 32,148,871 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Comparative Psychology
#508
of 1,709 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,762
of 83,886 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Comparative Psychology
#4
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 32,148,871 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 65th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,709 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 83,886 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.