↓ Skip to main content

Superoxide dismutase protects ribonucleotide reductase from inactivation in yeast

Overview of attention for article published in Free Radical Biology & Medicine, January 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
27 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Superoxide dismutase protects ribonucleotide reductase from inactivation in yeast
Published in
Free Radical Biology & Medicine, January 2018
DOI 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2018.01.001
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Ribonucleotide reductase (RNR) catalyses the rate limiting step of DNA synthesis utilising a mechanism that requires a tyrosyl radical. We have previously shown that superoxide can quench protein tyrosyl radicals in vitro, either by oxidative addition, or reduction of the radical to tyrosine. Here, we observe that Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains lacking either copper-zinc SOD (SOD1) or manganese SOD (SOD2) had decreased RNR activity compared to SOD competent yeast. When superoxide production was increased by treatment with paraquat, RNR activity was further decreased, with yeast lacking SOD1 being the most sensitive. The growth of yeast lacking SOD1 was also the most sensitive to paraquat treatment. Using expressed recombinant RNR, superoxide addition was not detectable using mass-spectrometry. This suggests that oxidative addition is not the major route of inhibition in our system, but does not rule out reduction by superoxide as a possible mechanism. Our results demonstrate that protection of RNR from inactivation by superoxide is an important function of SOD, particularly cytoplasmic SOD1.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 27 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 27 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Doctoral Student 4 15%
Researcher 4 15%
Student > Bachelor 3 11%
Professor 3 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 11%
Other 5 19%
Unknown 5 19%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 30%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 26%
Chemistry 2 7%
Environmental Science 1 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 4%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 8 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 February 2018.
All research outputs
#24,100,909
of 34,376,207 outputs
Outputs from Free Radical Biology & Medicine
#5,003
of 6,866 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#331,368
of 496,992 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Free Radical Biology & Medicine
#50
of 79 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,376,207 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,866 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 496,992 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 79 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.