↓ Skip to main content

Amyotrophic Lateral Ssclerosis and Structural Defects in Cu,Zn Superoxide Dismutase

Overview of attention for article published in Science, August 1993
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs
twitter
2 X users
patent
51 patents
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Readers on

mendeley
440 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Amyotrophic Lateral Ssclerosis and Structural Defects in Cu,Zn Superoxide Dismutase
Published in
Science, August 1993
DOI 10.1126/science.8351519
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Single-site mutants in the Cu,Zn superoxide dismutase (SOD) gene (SOD1) occur in patients with the fatal neurodegenerative disorder familial amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (FALS). Complete screening of the SOD1 coding region revealed that the mutation Ala4 to Val in exon 1 was the most frequent one; mutations were identified in exons 2, 4, and 5 but not in the active site region formed by exon 3. The 2.4 A crystal structure of human SOD, along with two other SOD structures, established that all 12 observed FALS mutant sites alter conserved interactions critical to the beta-barrel fold and dimer contact, rather than catalysis. Red cells from heterozygotes had less than 50 percent normal SOD activity, consistent with a structurally defective SOD dimer. Thus, defective SOD is linked to motor neuron death and carries implications for understanding and possible treatment of FALS.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 440 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 7 2%
United Kingdom 5 1%
Italy 1 <1%
Guatemala 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 423 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 81 18%
Researcher 62 14%
Student > Bachelor 55 13%
Student > Master 49 11%
Professor 30 7%
Other 81 18%
Unknown 82 19%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 98 22%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 82 19%
Neuroscience 67 15%
Medicine and Dentistry 30 7%
Chemistry 25 6%
Other 37 8%
Unknown 101 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 28. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 March 2025.
All research outputs
#1,707,521
of 33,666,858 outputs
Outputs from Science
#25,851
of 93,307 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#402
of 27,689 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Science
#14
of 190 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 33,666,858 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 93,307 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 65.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 27,689 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 190 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.