You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
ESTIMATION OF TIGER DENSITIES IN INDIA USING PHOTOGRAPHIC CAPTURES AND RECAPTURES
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Ecology, December 1998
|
| DOI | 10.1890/0012-9658(1998)079[2852:eotdii]2.0.co;2 |
| Authors |
K. Ullas Karanth, James D. Nichols |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 50% |
| India | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 1 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 50% |
| Scientists | 2 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,174 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 16 | 1% |
| Brazil | 13 | 1% |
| United Kingdom | 9 | <1% |
| India | 7 | <1% |
| Spain | 4 | <1% |
| Colombia | 4 | <1% |
| Chile | 3 | <1% |
| Czechia | 3 | <1% |
| Australia | 3 | <1% |
| Other | 21 | 2% |
| Unknown | 1091 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 251 | 21% |
| Researcher | 217 | 18% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 207 | 18% |
| Student > Bachelor | 125 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 58 | 5% |
| Other | 158 | 13% |
| Unknown | 158 | 13% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 632 | 54% |
| Environmental Science | 272 | 23% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 24 | 2% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 15 | 1% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 7 | <1% |
| Other | 33 | 3% |
| Unknown | 191 | 16% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 April 2024.
All research outputs
#6,796,761
of 25,502,817 outputs
Outputs from Ecology
#2,859
of 6,888 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,929
of 109,862 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ecology
#2
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,502,817 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,888 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 109,862 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.