↓ Skip to main content

Early descriptions of antibiosis.

Overview of attention for article published in British Journal of General Practice, December 1974
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

wikipedia
12 Wikipedia pages

Readers on

mendeley
58 Mendeley
Title
Early descriptions of antibiosis.
Published in
British Journal of General Practice, December 1974
Pubmed ID
Authors

W Foster, A Raoult

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 58 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Thailand 1 2%
Australia 1 2%
Unknown 56 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 17%
Student > Bachelor 9 16%
Student > Master 9 16%
Researcher 8 14%
Student > Postgraduate 5 9%
Other 10 17%
Unknown 7 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 18 31%
Medicine and Dentistry 9 16%
Immunology and Microbiology 4 7%
Chemistry 4 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 7%
Other 11 19%
Unknown 8 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 January 2024.
All research outputs
#8,537,346
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of General Practice
#2,838
of 4,877 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,031
of 20,220 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of General Practice
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,877 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.7. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 20,220 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them