↓ Skip to main content

Y-chromosome evidence suggests a common paternal heritage of Austro-Asiatic populations

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Ecology and Evolution, March 2007
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (68th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (59th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
wikipedia
12 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
85 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
83 Mendeley
citeulike
3 CiteULike
Title
Y-chromosome evidence suggests a common paternal heritage of Austro-Asiatic populations
Published in
BMC Ecology and Evolution, March 2007
DOI 10.1186/1471-2148-7-47
Pubmed ID
Authors

Vikrant Kumar, Arimanda NS Reddy, Jagedeesh P Babu, Tipirisetti N Rao, Banrida T Langstieh, Kumarasamy Thangaraj, Alla G Reddy, Lalji Singh, Battini M Reddy

Abstract

The Austro-Asiatic linguistic family, which is considered to be the oldest of all the families in India, has a substantial presence in Southeast Asia. However, the possibility of any genetic link among the linguistic sub-families of the Indian Austro-Asiatics on the one hand and between the Indian and the Southeast Asian Austro-Asiatics on the other has not been explored till now. Therefore, to trace the origin and historic expansion of Austro-Asiatic groups of India, we analysed Y-chromosome SNP and STR data of the 1222 individuals from 25 Indian populations, covering all the three branches of Austro-Asiatic tribes, viz. Mundari, Khasi-Khmuic and Mon-Khmer, along with the previously published data on 214 relevant populations from Asia and Oceania.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 83 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Chile 1 1%
Australia 1 1%
India 1 1%
New Zealand 1 1%
Spain 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Unknown 77 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 23 28%
Student > Ph. D. Student 23 28%
Student > Master 10 12%
Professor > Associate Professor 5 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 5%
Other 11 13%
Unknown 7 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 28 34%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 16 19%
Social Sciences 8 10%
Arts and Humanities 6 7%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 4%
Other 12 14%
Unknown 10 12%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 January 2024.
All research outputs
#6,897,536
of 25,795,662 outputs
Outputs from BMC Ecology and Evolution
#1,517
of 3,729 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,447
of 92,426 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Ecology and Evolution
#15
of 37 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,795,662 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,729 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 92,426 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 37 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.