Evaluate the pathophysiology of contrast extravasation.
Two hundred fifty-five sialograms at the University of Iowa from 2008 to 2016 were reviewed.
Twelve sialograms (4.7% of total) were identified with main ductal extravasation. In each case, ductal stenosis as a diagnosis was supported by clinical history and the finding of difficulty in advancing the cannula into the duct during sialography. In all but 1 case, extravasation occurred at the distal duct with no further imaging of the ductal system. Each of the 5 cases treated with sialendoscopy with or without gland resection confirmed stenosis. Ultrasound evaluation of 5 of the cases detected ductal dilation in 4 (80%). Six of 11 computed tomography scans done before the sialogram were interpreted as normal with indirect evidence for ductal stenosis (duct dilation) reported in only 1. All extravasations were associated with either stricture alone or stricture with stone (1 case).
Radiocontrast extravasation from the main duct during sialography is highly associated with the presence of ductal stricture. In our experience, the inability to fill the ductal system with radiocontrast is a useful sialographic finding that correlated closely with anatomic abnormality rather than technical error. The frequent finding of extravasation of radiocontrast supports the use of water soluble contrast.
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 January 2018.
All research outputs
#25,003,514
of 27,788,586 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Otology, Rhinology & Laryngology
#1,854
of 2,152 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#399,370
of 457,372 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Otology, Rhinology & Laryngology
#25
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 27,788,586 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,152 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.2. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 457,372 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
