↓ Skip to main content

Conservation Genetics of the Endangered Isle Royale Gray Wolf

Overview of attention for article published in Conservation Biology, July 2005
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (70th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (63rd percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
159 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
232 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Conservation Genetics of the Endangered Isle Royale Gray Wolf
Published in
Conservation Biology, July 2005
DOI 10.1111/j.1523-1739.1991.tb00386.x
Authors

R. K. WAYNE, N. LEHMAN, D. GIRMAN, P.J.P. GOGAN, D. A. GILBERT, K. HANSEN, R. O. PETERSON, U. S. SEAL, A. EISENHAWER, L. D. MECH, R.J. KRUMENAKER

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 232 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 4 2%
India 3 1%
United States 2 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Czechia 2 <1%
Austria 1 <1%
Uruguay 1 <1%
Turkey 1 <1%
United Arab Emirates 1 <1%
Other 6 3%
Unknown 209 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 60 26%
Student > Ph. D. Student 38 16%
Student > Master 36 16%
Student > Bachelor 23 10%
Other 15 6%
Other 38 16%
Unknown 22 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 149 64%
Environmental Science 43 19%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 3%
Social Sciences 3 1%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 2 <1%
Other 4 2%
Unknown 24 10%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 January 2011.
All research outputs
#5,235,915
of 24,662,675 outputs
Outputs from Conservation Biology
#2,019
of 3,981 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,703
of 63,390 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Conservation Biology
#14
of 49 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,662,675 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,981 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 23.0. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 63,390 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 49 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.