↓ Skip to main content

Does General Practitioner Gatekeeping Curb Health Care Expenditure?

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Health Services Research & Policy, January 2000
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
6 policy sources
twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
67 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Does General Practitioner Gatekeeping Curb Health Care Expenditure?
Published in
Journal of Health Services Research & Policy, January 2000
DOI 10.1177/135581960000500107
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

It is generally assumed that health care systems in which specialist and hospital care is only accessible after referral by a general practitioner (GP) have lower total health care costs. In this study, the following questions were addressed: do health care systems with GPs acting as gatekeepers to specialized care have lower health care expenditure than those with directly accessible specialist care? Does health care expenditure increase more rapidly in countries without a referral system than in those with the GP acting as a gatekeeper?

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 67 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 3%
United States 1 1%
Norway 1 1%
Unknown 63 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 16 24%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 19%
Other 8 12%
Student > Bachelor 4 6%
Researcher 4 6%
Other 9 13%
Unknown 13 19%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 22 33%
Social Sciences 12 18%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 8 12%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 3%
Other 4 6%
Unknown 17 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 19. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 October 2026.
All research outputs
#2,199,609
of 28,583,110 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Health Services Research & Policy
#90
of 806 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,084
of 122,413 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Health Services Research & Policy
#1
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 28,583,110 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 806 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 122,413 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them