You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Mast Flowering and Semelparity in Bamboos: The Bamboo Fire Cycle Hypothesis.
|
---|---|
Published in |
The American Naturalist, September 1999
|
DOI | 10.1086/303243 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Jon E Keeley, William J Bond |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 187 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 5 | 3% |
Brazil | 2 | 1% |
South Africa | 2 | 1% |
Canada | 2 | 1% |
Argentina | 2 | 1% |
United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
Ecuador | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 172 | 92% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 42 | 22% |
Student > Master | 26 | 14% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 23 | 12% |
Student > Bachelor | 16 | 9% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 13 | 7% |
Other | 39 | 21% |
Unknown | 28 | 15% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 89 | 48% |
Environmental Science | 39 | 21% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 8 | 4% |
Earth and Planetary Sciences | 8 | 4% |
Engineering | 3 | 2% |
Other | 7 | 4% |
Unknown | 33 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 March 2022.
All research outputs
#3,738,583
of 23,371,053 outputs
Outputs from The American Naturalist
#1,076
of 3,842 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,280
of 35,122 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The American Naturalist
#3
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,371,053 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,842 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 35,122 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.