Title |
National standards for forensic pathology training slow to develop
|
---|---|
Published in |
Canadian Medical Association Journal, July 2007
|
DOI | 10.1503/cmaj.070881 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Dan Lett |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 10 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Nigeria | 1 | 10% |
Unknown | 9 | 90% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 20% |
Unspecified | 1 | 10% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 10% |
Student > Master | 1 | 10% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 10% |
Other | 2 | 20% |
Unknown | 2 | 20% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 40% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 10% |
Unspecified | 1 | 10% |
Chemistry | 1 | 10% |
Materials Science | 1 | 10% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 2 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 February 2024.
All research outputs
#7,451,584
of 22,780,967 outputs
Outputs from Canadian Medical Association Journal
#4,782
of 8,690 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,221
of 66,608 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Canadian Medical Association Journal
#28
of 53 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,780,967 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,690 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.0. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 66,608 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 53 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.