↓ Skip to main content

Weaning from mechanical cardiac support in patients with idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy.

Overview of attention for article published in Circulation, July 1997
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

f1000
1 research highlight platform

Readers on

mendeley
17 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Weaning from mechanical cardiac support in patients with idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy.
Published in
Circulation, July 1997
DOI 10.1161/01.cir.96.2.542
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Implantation of mechanical cardiac support systems (MCSS) in patients with idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy (IDC) may improve cardiac function and allow explantation of the device. We report of long-term effects of ventricular unloading on cardiac function, humoral anti-beta1-adrenoceptor autoantibodies (A-beta1-AABs), and myocardial fibrosis. Seventeen patients in New York Heart Association functional class IV with nonischemic IDC received MCSS. All had a cardiac index of < 1.6 L x min(-1) x m(-2) of body surface area, a left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) of <16%, and a left ventricular internal diameter in diastole (LVIDd) of >68 mm and tested positive for A-beta1-AABs. Echocardiographic evaluation, serum tests for A-beta1-AABs, and histological assessment of myocardial fibrosis were performed before and after MCSS implantation. The mean support duration was 230+/-201 days. Six patients died, four were transplanted, and two are still on MCSS. Five patients with significant cardiac recovery (mean LVIDd, 54+/-2.3 mm; LVEF, 47+/-3.7%) were weaned after 160 to 794 days and are now device free for 51 to 592 days. A-beta1-AABs disappeared gradually during MCSS without increase after weaning; cardiac function and volume density of fibrosis remained normal. Nine patients' cardiac function hardly improved during ventricular unloading. Cardiac function can be normalized in selected patients with end-stage IDC by MCSS. The degree of preoperative myocardial fibrosis may be an indicator for outcome; A-beta1-AABs can be used to monitor myocyte recovery. Weaning from MCSS offers an alternative to cardiac transplantation in certain patients.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Germany 1 6%
Unknown 16 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 29%
Student > Master 2 12%
Researcher 2 12%
Librarian 1 6%
Other 1 6%
Other 3 18%
Unknown 3 18%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 5 29%
Engineering 3 18%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 12%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 6%
Computer Science 1 6%
Other 1 6%
Unknown 4 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 September 2014.
All research outputs
#17,289,387
of 25,377,790 outputs
Outputs from Circulation
#18,515
of 21,093 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#26,274
of 28,423 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Circulation
#95
of 100 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,377,790 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 21,093 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 31.4. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 28,423 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 100 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.