↓ Skip to main content

Design and validation of a bioreactor for engineering vocal fold tissues under combined tensile and vibrational stresses

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Biomechanics, October 2004
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (80th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (77th percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
5 patents
wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages
reddit
1 Redditor

Readers on

mendeley
78 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Design and validation of a bioreactor for engineering vocal fold tissues under combined tensile and vibrational stresses
Published in
Journal of Biomechanics, October 2004
DOI 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2004.01.007
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Criteria are outlined for the design of a bioreactor that can simulate the vibrational stresses in vocal fold movement during speech. Requirements are 0-1 mm amplitudes in the 20-200 Hz frequency range, a variable on-off stress regime, and maintenance of tissue viability over several days. The bioreactor uses dual drivers, one for low frequency (or static) strains, and another for high-frequencies vibrational strains. Response is linear at the driving end for an input of 0-5 V. The amplitude decreases linearly with frequency at constant input voltage, and the phase changes by nearly 180 degrees over the 20-200 Hz range. Human vocal fold fibroblasts were cultured in a polymer substrate and subjected to static and vibrational forces. The results indicate that vibratory strain alters the expression levels of many extracellular matrix-related genes, as well as the spatial distribution of cells and matrix.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 78 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 4 5%
Portugal 1 1%
Czechia 1 1%
Unknown 72 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 23%
Researcher 14 18%
Student > Master 7 9%
Other 6 8%
Student > Bachelor 5 6%
Other 18 23%
Unknown 10 13%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 22 28%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 12 15%
Medicine and Dentistry 8 10%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 4%
Neuroscience 3 4%
Other 16 21%
Unknown 14 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 October 2025.
All research outputs
#6,848,850
of 32,083,093 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Biomechanics
#1,269
of 6,292 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,001
of 98,436 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Biomechanics
#7
of 31 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 32,083,093 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 78th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,292 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 98,436 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 31 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.