↓ Skip to main content

Factors associated with availability of anticoagulation reversal agents in rural and community emergency departments

Overview of attention for article published in American Journal of Health-System Pharmacy, January 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Readers on

mendeley
25 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Factors associated with availability of anticoagulation reversal agents in rural and community emergency departments
Published in
American Journal of Health-System Pharmacy, January 2018
DOI 10.2146/ajhp160520
Pubmed ID
Authors

Brett A. Faine, Julie Amendola, Jordan Homan, Azeemuddin Ahmed, Nicholas Mohr

Abstract

Results of a study of anticoagulation reversal agent availability in rural and community hospital emergency departments (EDs) are reported. A cross-sectional telephone survey was conducted to test the hypothesis that anticoagulation reversal agents are not commonly stocked in low-volume EDs. In phase 1 of the study, a physician, pharmacist, or nurse manager at a sample of EDs in 1 state was surveyed to characterize anticoagulation reversal agent availability and the presence or absence of reversal protocols; in phase 2, follow-up qualitative interviews were conducted with hospital pharmacists selected by purposive sampling to identify barriers to availability. Among the 103 EDs represented in the survey, 87 (84%) stocked fresh frozen plasma, 14 (14%) stocked 4-factor prothrombin complex concentrate (4F-PCC), and 2 (2%) stocked activated 4F-PCC. Forty-one EDs (40%) had a warfarin reversal protocol, but only 2 (2%) EDs had a protocol for direct oral anticoagulant reversal. ED volume and neurology coverage were significantly associated with reversal agent availability (p = 0.014) and warfarin protocol availability (p < 0.001). Identified factors contributing to reversal agent nonavailability were product cost, lack of knowledge of drug availability, and concerns about shelf life. An investigation of rural and community hospitals in 1 state revealed that the institutions rarely have specialized anticoagulation reversal drugs available. Cost and infrequency of utilization were 2 commonly cited reasons for reversal agent nonavailability.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 25 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 25 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 16%
Researcher 4 16%
Student > Bachelor 3 12%
Other 2 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 8%
Other 3 12%
Unknown 7 28%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 7 28%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 16%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 12%
Social Sciences 2 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 4%
Other 1 4%
Unknown 7 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 February 2018.
All research outputs
#23,329,605
of 34,411,289 outputs
Outputs from American Journal of Health-System Pharmacy
#3,726
of 5,284 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#331,894
of 518,499 outputs
Outputs of similar age from American Journal of Health-System Pharmacy
#59
of 84 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,411,289 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,284 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.4. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 518,499 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 84 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.