SITA-Standard perimetry has better performance than FDT2 matrix perimetry for detecting glaucomatous progression

Overview of attention for article published in British Journal of Ophthalmology, January 2018

Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (67th percentile)
Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (73rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter: 7 X users

Readers on

mendeley: 17 Mendeley

So far, Altmetric has seen 8 X posts from 7 X users, with an upper bound of 15,118 followers.

SITA-Standard perimetry has better performance than FDT2 matrix perimetry for detecting glaucomatous progression @BMJ_Ophth | #ECM https://t.co/FU2mYdlwNI

RT @ProfOculista: SITA-Standard perimetry has better performance than FDT2 matrix perimetry for detecting glaucomatous progression @BMJ_Oph…

SITA-Standard perimetry has better performance than FDT2 matrix perimetry for detecting glaucomatous progression @BMJ_Ophth | #ECM https://t.co/FU2mYdlwNI

SITA-Standard perimetry has better performance than FDT2 matrix perimetry for detecting glaucomatous progression https://t.co/4mCU2BQsSQ #bmj #oftalmologia #ophthalmology

This page shows the most recent X posts that mention this research output. Click here to find out how to access more activity, including 4 additional X posts.