↓ Skip to main content

Noise properties of proton density fat fraction estimated using chemical shift–encoded MRI

Overview of attention for article published in Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, January 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (80th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
patent
3 patents

Readers on

mendeley
50 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Noise properties of proton density fat fraction estimated using chemical shift–encoded MRI
Published in
Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, January 2018
DOI 10.1002/mrm.27065
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

The purpose of this work is to characterize the noise distribution of proton density fat fraction (PDFF) measured using chemical shift-encoded MRI, and to provide alternative strategies to reduce bias in PDFF estimation. We derived the probability density function for PDFF estimated using chemical shift-encoded MRI, and found it to exhibit an asymmetric noise distribution that contributes to signal-to-noise-ratio dependent bias. To study PDFF noise bias, we performed (at 1.5 T) numerical simulations, phantom acquisitions, and a retrospective in vivo experiment. In each experiment, we compared the performance of three statistics (mean, median, and maximum likelihood estimator) in estimating the PDFF in a region of interest. We demonstrated the presence of the asymmetric noise distribution in simulations, phantoms, and in vivo. In each experiment we demonstrated that both the median and proposed maximum likelihood estimator statistics outperformed the mean statistic in mitigating noise-related bias for low signal-to-noise-ratio acquisitions. Characterization of the noise distribution of PDFF estimated using chemical shift-encoded MRI enabled new strategies based on median and maximum likelihood estimator statistics to mitigate noise-related bias for accurate PDFF measurement from a region of interest. Such strategies are important for quantitative chemical shift-encoded MRI applications that typically operate in low signal-to-noise-ratio regimes. Magn Reson Med, 2018. © 2018 International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 50 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 50 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 13 26%
Researcher 10 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 14%
Other 4 8%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 4%
Other 5 10%
Unknown 9 18%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 16 32%
Engineering 11 22%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 8%
Physics and Astronomy 3 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 2%
Other 2 4%
Unknown 13 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 June 2026.
All research outputs
#5,799,425
of 33,610,548 outputs
Outputs from Magnetic Resonance in Medicine
#1,614
of 8,157 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#91,590
of 495,648 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Magnetic Resonance in Medicine
#10
of 101 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 33,610,548 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,157 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 495,648 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 101 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.