↓ Skip to main content

Telomerase reverse transcriptase protects against angiotensin II-induced microvascular endothelial dysfunction

Overview of attention for article published in American Journal of Physiology: Heart & Circulatory Physiology, December 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Readers on

mendeley
27 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Telomerase reverse transcriptase protects against angiotensin II-induced microvascular endothelial dysfunction
Published in
American Journal of Physiology: Heart & Circulatory Physiology, December 2017
DOI 10.1152/ajpheart.00472.2017
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

A rise in reactive oxygen species (ROS) may contribute to cardiovascular disease by reducing nitric oxide (NO) levels, leading to loss of NO's vasodilator and anti-inflammatory effects. Although primarily studied in the larger conduit arteries, excess ROS release and a corresponding loss of NO also occurs in the smaller resistance arteries of the microcirculation, but underlying mechanisms and therapeutic targets have not been fully characterized. We examined whether either of the two subunits of telomerase, telomerase reverse transcriptase (TERT) or telomerase RNA component (TERC), affect microvascular ROS production and peak vasodilation at baseline and in response to in vivo administration to angiotensin II (ANG II). We report that genetic loss of TERT [max dilation (%): Vehicle 52.0{plus minus}6.1, L-NAME: 60.4{plus minus}12.9, Peg-CAT: 32.2{plus minus}12.2*; N = 9-19; *P<0.05] but not TERC [max dilation (%): Vehicle 79{plus minus}5; L-NAME 10.7{plus minus}9.8*; Peg-CAT 86.4{plus minus}8.4; N = 4-7; *P<0.05] promotes flow-induced ROS formation. Moreover, TERT KO exacerbates the microvascular dysfunction resulting from in vivo ANG II treatment, whereas TERT overexpression is protective [max dilation (%): vehicle: 88.22{plus minus}4.6 vs. ANG II (1000ng/kg/min) 74.0{plus minus}7.3; N = 4; P=NS]. Therefore, loss of TERT but not TERC may be a key contributor to the elevated microvascular ROS levels and reduced peak dilation observed in several cardiovascular disease pathologies.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 27 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 27 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 15%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 15%
Other 2 7%
Student > Bachelor 2 7%
Student > Master 2 7%
Other 4 15%
Unknown 9 33%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 6 22%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 15%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 15%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 7%
Sports and Recreations 2 7%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 9 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 May 2019.
All research outputs
#22,724,009
of 34,376,207 outputs
Outputs from American Journal of Physiology: Heart & Circulatory Physiology
#5,732
of 7,399 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#303,801
of 494,131 outputs
Outputs of similar age from American Journal of Physiology: Heart & Circulatory Physiology
#33
of 58 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,376,207 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,399 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.2. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 494,131 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 58 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.