↓ Skip to main content

A spectrum of sharing: maximization of information content for brain imaging data

Overview of attention for article published in Giga Science, January 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
11 X users
peer_reviews
1 peer review site
weibo
1 weibo user
facebook
3 Facebook pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Readers on

mendeley
53 Mendeley
Title
A spectrum of sharing: maximization of information content for brain imaging data
Published in
Giga Science, January 2015
DOI 10.1186/s13742-014-0042-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Vince D Calhoun

Abstract

Efforts to expand sharing of neuroimaging data have been growing exponentially in recent years. There are several different types of data sharing which can be considered to fall along a spectrum, ranging from simpler and less informative to more complex and more informative. In this paper we consider this spectrum for three domains: data capture, data density, and data analysis. Here the focus is on the right end of the spectrum, that is, how to maximize the information content while addressing the challenges. A summary of associated challenges of and possible solutions is presented in this review and includes: 1) a discussion of tools to monitor quality of data as it is collected and encourage adoption of data mapping standards; 2) sharing of time-series data (not just summary maps or regions); and 3) the use of analytic approaches which maximize sharing potential as much as possible. Examples of existing solutions for each of these points, which we developed in our lab, are also discussed including the use of a comprehensive beginning-to-end neuroinformatics platform and the use of flexible analytic approaches, such as independent component analysis and multivariate classification approaches, such as deep learning.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 53 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 4%
United Kingdom 2 4%
Netherlands 1 2%
Hong Kong 1 2%
Brazil 1 2%
Greece 1 2%
Korea, Republic of 1 2%
Unknown 44 83%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 11 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 19%
Student > Master 7 13%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 8%
Other 4 8%
Other 10 19%
Unknown 7 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 10 19%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 13%
Engineering 6 11%
Neuroscience 5 9%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 6%
Other 8 15%
Unknown 14 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 January 2018.
All research outputs
#3,585,791
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Giga Science
#671
of 1,167 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#49,224
of 361,607 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Giga Science
#8
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,167 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.8. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 361,607 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.