You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Tools for managing hydrologic alteration on a regional scale: Setting targets to protect stream health
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Freshwater Biology, January 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1111/fwb.13062 |
| Authors |
Raphael D. Mazor, Jason T. May, Ashmita Sengupta, Kenneth S. McCune, Brian P. Bledsoe, Eric D. Stein |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 38% |
| Unknown | 5 | 63% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 3 | 38% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 38% |
| Members of the public | 2 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 87 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 87 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 25 | 29% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 18 | 21% |
| Student > Master | 14 | 16% |
| Other | 4 | 5% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 5 | 6% |
| Unknown | 18 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 23 | 26% |
| Environmental Science | 21 | 24% |
| Engineering | 8 | 9% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 5 | 6% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 2 | 2% |
| Unknown | 27 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 January 2018.
All research outputs
#7,593,701
of 24,417,958 outputs
Outputs from Freshwater Biology
#824
of 2,607 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#158,153
of 482,798 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Freshwater Biology
#21
of 51 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,417,958 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,607 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 482,798 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 51 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.