↓ Skip to main content

A metabotropic glutamate receptor variant functions as a taste receptor

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Neuroscience, February 2000
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (91st percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
patent
61 patents
wikipedia
28 Wikipedia pages
video
1 YouTube creator

Readers on

mendeley
222 Mendeley
connotea
1 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
A metabotropic glutamate receptor variant functions as a taste receptor
Published in
Nature Neuroscience, February 2000
DOI 10.1038/72053
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Sensory transduction for many taste stimuli such as sugars, some bitter compounds and amino acids is thought to be mediated via G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs), although no such receptors that respond to taste stimuli are yet identified. Monosodium L-glutamate (L-MSG), a natural component of many foods, is an important gustatory stimulus believed to signal dietary protein. We describe a GPCR cloned from rat taste buds and functionally expressed in CHO cells. The receptor couples negatively to a cAMP cascade and shows an unusual concentration-response relationship. The similarity of its properties to MSG taste suggests that this receptor is a taste receptor for glutamate.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 222 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Germany 3 1%
Japan 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Unknown 216 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 36 16%
Student > Bachelor 33 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 32 14%
Student > Master 26 12%
Professor 10 5%
Other 32 14%
Unknown 53 24%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 61 27%
Medicine and Dentistry 25 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 16 7%
Chemistry 13 6%
Neuroscience 12 5%
Other 38 17%
Unknown 57 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 29. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 October 2026.
All research outputs
#1,742,182
of 34,601,305 outputs
Outputs from Nature Neuroscience
#2,443
of 6,545 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,242
of 159,220 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Neuroscience
#3
of 36 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,601,305 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,545 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 62.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 159,220 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 36 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.