↓ Skip to main content

Surgical Management of Tumors Involving Meckel's Cave and Cavernous Sinus

Overview of attention for article published in Otology & Neurotology, January 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
45 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Surgical Management of Tumors Involving Meckel's Cave and Cavernous Sinus
Published in
Otology & Neurotology, January 2018
DOI 10.1097/mao.0000000000001602
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

To study the indications and outcomes of lateral sphenoidectomy as part of a combined skull base approach in the treatment of tumors involving Meckel's cave (MC) and cavernous sinus (CS). Retrospective patient series. Tertiary referral center. Twenty-two consecutive patients (mean age: 45 yr, range: 16-76) who underwent transzygomatic, extended middle fossa approaches for tumors involving MC and CS. Surgical access to MC and CS was achieved via extended middle fossa, trans-clinoid approach. Lateral sphenoidectomy was defined as drill-out of the greater sphenoid wing lateral to foramen rotundum and ovale, decompression of superior orbital fissure, and removal of anterior clinoid process. Reconstruction was achieved using combination of autologous and synthetic materials. Eleven patients (50%) received adjuvant radiation. Tumor pathologies included meningioma (16 patients), epidermoid cyst (2), trigeminal schwannoma (2), invasive pituitary adenoma (1), and chondrosarcoma (1). Mean (range) preoperative tumor size was 4.0 cm (1.3-9). Mean (range) length of follow-up was 4 years (range 0.1-10). Overall tumor control and gross total resection were achieved in 95 and 23% of patients, respectively. Lateral sphenoidectomy was performed in 16 patients (73%) for enhanced surgical access and/or tumor extension to the infratemporal fossa (6 patients). Postoperatively, cranial nerve deficits occurred in 12 (55%) patients (V-9 patients; III, IV, or VI-4; VII-2; VIII-2). Cerebrospinal fluid leak and hydrocephalus occurred in two and four patients, respectively. In combination with middle fossa-based approaches to tumors involving MC and CS, lateral sphenoidectomy may play a viable role in tumor access and control.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 45 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 45 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Doctoral Student 6 13%
Student > Master 5 11%
Researcher 5 11%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 7%
Other 2 4%
Other 8 18%
Unknown 16 36%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 16 36%
Neuroscience 5 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 7%
Design 1 2%
Unknown 20 44%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 January 2018.
All research outputs
#17,926,658
of 23,016,919 outputs
Outputs from Otology & Neurotology
#2,173
of 3,746 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#310,377
of 442,354 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Otology & Neurotology
#53
of 96 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,016,919 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,746 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.0. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 442,354 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 96 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.