↓ Skip to main content
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (66th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
wikipedia
9 Wikipedia pages

Readers on

mendeley
19 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Food-Induced “Dose-Dumping” from a Once-a-Day Theophylline Product as a Cause of Theophylline Toxicity
Published in
CHEST, June 1985
DOI 10.1378/chest.87.6.758
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Three slow-release preparations of theophylline have received approval from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for "once-daily" dosing indications, amid controversy regarding the appropriateness of this decision. Because of specific concerns regarding data submitted to the FDA in support of the first of these products to be approved, Theo-24, we examined the absorption characteristics of this newly marketed formulation. Eight healthy volunteers received, in a crossover manner, single doses of a theophylline reference solution and Theo-24, taken both fasting and after a breakfast of bacon and eggs. The concentrations of theophylline were measured up to 60 hours after the dose. Absorption of Theo-24 after an overnight fast was very slow, with only 71 +/- 6 percent (mean +/- SE) of the dose ultimately absorbed. In contrast, food caused precipitous "dose-dumping," resulting in dose-normalized peak levels in the serum that averaged 2.3 times higher than after a fasting dose. About half of the dose was absorbed in a four-hour period, generally beginning six to eight hours after the postprandial dose, and complete absorption was then attained within 24 hours (p less than 0.001). Toxic effects of theophylline occurred in four subjects when they took the dose with food whereas no toxic effects occurred during the fasting regimen. Consequently, doses of Theo-24 that would have attained a predicted peak concentration of 15 micrograms/ml after multiple dosing taken without food would, if taken with food, have resulted in larger fluctuations and in peak concentrations in the potentially toxic range for six of the eight subjects.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 19 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 1 5%
Japan 1 5%
United Kingdom 1 5%
Unknown 16 84%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 26%
Student > Master 3 16%
Researcher 3 16%
Student > Postgraduate 3 16%
Other 1 5%
Other 2 11%
Unknown 2 11%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 7 37%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 16%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 11%
Chemistry 2 11%
Arts and Humanities 1 5%
Other 2 11%
Unknown 2 11%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 January 2025.
All research outputs
#11,471,584
of 34,410,315 outputs
Outputs from CHEST
#9,524
of 18,094 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,690
of 14,184 outputs
Outputs of similar age from CHEST
#12
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,410,315 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 65th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 18,094 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.1. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 14,184 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.