↓ Skip to main content

Susceptibility of oral bacteria to Melaleuca alternifolia (tea tree) oil in vitro

Overview of attention for article published in Oral Microbiology & Immunology, October 2003
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (58th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages
reddit
1 Redditor

Readers on

mendeley
117 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Susceptibility of oral bacteria to Melaleuca alternifolia (tea tree) oil in vitro
Published in
Oral Microbiology & Immunology, October 2003
DOI 10.1046/j.0902-0055.2003.00105.x
Pubmed ID
Authors

K. A. Hammer, L. Dry, M. Johnson, E. M. Michalak, C. F. Carson, T. V. Riley

Abstract

The in vitro activity of Melaleuca alternifolia (tea tree) oil against 161 isolates of oral bacteria from 15 genera was determined. Minimum inhibitory concentrations (MIC) and minimum bactericidal concentrations (MBC) ranged from 0.003 to 2.0% (v/v). MIC90 values were 1.0% (v/v) for Actinomyces spp., Lactobacillus spp., Streptococcus mitis and Streptococcus sanguis, and 0.1% (v/v) for Prevotella spp. Isolates of Porphyromonas, Prevotella and Veillonella had the lowest MICs and MBCs, and isolates of Streptococcus, Fusobacterium and Lactobacillus had the highest. Time kill studies with Streptococcus mutans and Lactobacillus rhamnosus showed that treatment with > or = 0.5% tea tree oil caused decreases in viability of >3 log colony forming units/ml after only 30 s, and viable organisms were not detected after 5 min. These studies indicate that a range of oral bacteria are susceptible to tea tree oil, suggesting that tea tree oil may be of use in oral healthcare products and in the maintenance of oral hygiene.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 117 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Malaysia 1 <1%
Unknown 116 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 16 14%
Student > Master 14 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 9%
Student > Bachelor 10 9%
Student > Postgraduate 9 8%
Other 22 19%
Unknown 35 30%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 20 17%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 16 14%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 12 10%
Chemistry 7 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 3%
Other 20 17%
Unknown 38 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 January 2022.
All research outputs
#11,231,762
of 34,360,257 outputs
Outputs from Oral Microbiology & Immunology
#135
of 366 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,804
of 81,018 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Oral Microbiology & Immunology
#3
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,360,257 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 66th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 366 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 81,018 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.