↓ Skip to main content

A CYANOBACTERIAL CIRCADIAN TIMING MECHANISM

Overview of attention for article published in Annual Review of Genetics, December 2003
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (74th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
wikipedia
6 Wikipedia pages

Readers on

mendeley
132 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
A CYANOBACTERIAL CIRCADIAN TIMING MECHANISM
Published in
Annual Review of Genetics, December 2003
DOI 10.1146/annurev.genet.37.110801.142716
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Cyanobacteria such as Synechococcus elongatus PCC 7942 exhibit 24-h rhythms of gene expression that are controlled by an endogenous circadian clock that is mechanistically distinct from those described for diverse eukaryotes. Genetic and biochemical experiments over the past decade have identified key components of the circadian oscillator, input pathways that synchronize the clock with the daily environment, and output pathways that relay temporal information to downstream genes. The mechanism of the cyanobacterial circadian clock that is emerging is based principally on the assembly and disassembly of a large complex at whose heart are the proteins KaiA, KaiB, and KaiC. Signal transduction pathways that feed into and out of the clock employ protein domains that are similar to those in two-component regulatory systems of bacteria.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 132 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 8 6%
Russia 1 <1%
Hungary 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Unknown 120 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 28 21%
Researcher 18 14%
Student > Bachelor 16 12%
Professor 11 8%
Student > Master 11 8%
Other 25 19%
Unknown 23 17%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 50 38%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 26 20%
Chemistry 5 4%
Environmental Science 5 4%
Immunology and Microbiology 4 3%
Other 15 11%
Unknown 27 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 December 2020.
All research outputs
#7,581,964
of 34,361,833 outputs
Outputs from Annual Review of Genetics
#415
of 894 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#31,319
of 199,255 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annual Review of Genetics
#9
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,361,833 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 894 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.2. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 199,255 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.