↓ Skip to main content

Theoretical Literature Review: Tracing the Life Cycle of a Theory and Its Verified and Falsified Statements

Overview of attention for article published in Human Resource Development Review, January 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (73rd percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
3 X users

Readers on

mendeley
298 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Theoretical Literature Review: Tracing the Life Cycle of a Theory and Its Verified and Falsified Statements
Published in
Human Resource Development Review, January 2018
DOI 10.1177/1534484317749680
Authors

John R. Turner, Rose Baker, Frank Kellner

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 298 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 298 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 39 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 38 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 23 8%
Lecturer 17 6%
Student > Bachelor 10 3%
Other 38 13%
Unknown 133 45%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Business, Management and Accounting 48 16%
Social Sciences 36 12%
Nursing and Health Professions 13 4%
Computer Science 13 4%
Arts and Humanities 8 3%
Other 44 15%
Unknown 136 46%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 July 2026.
All research outputs
#8,894,953
of 33,493,714 outputs
Outputs from Human Resource Development Review
#83
of 314 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#129,449
of 493,412 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Human Resource Development Review
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 33,493,714 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 314 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 493,412 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them