↓ Skip to main content

Mexican plants with hypoglycaemic effect used in the treatment of diabetes

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Ethnopharmacology, July 2005
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
2 policy sources
patent
6 patents
wikipedia
5 Wikipedia pages

Readers on

mendeley
647 Mendeley
citeulike
4 CiteULike
connotea
1 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Mexican plants with hypoglycaemic effect used in the treatment of diabetes
Published in
Journal of Ethnopharmacology, July 2005
DOI 10.1016/j.jep.2005.04.019
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Diabetes mellitus is a syndrome which affects more and more people in all countries over the world. In México, it is commonly treated with herbal extracts. Such treatment may be of considerable benefit especially during the early stages of the illness. In this review, we discuss species commonly used in México in the treatment of diabetes. A total of 306 species have records of a popular use in the treatment of this syndrome in México. Seven of these species--Cecropia obtusifolia Bertol. (Cecropiaceae), Equisetum myriochaetum Schlecht & Cham (Equisetaceae), Acosmium panamense (Benth.) Yacolev (Fabaceae), Cucurbita ficifolia Bouché (Cucurbitaceae), Agarista mexicana (Hemsl.) Judd. (Ericaeae), Brickellia veronicaefolia (Kunth) A. Gray (Asteraceae), Parmentiera aculeata (Kunth) Seem. (Bignoniaceae)--are discussed in greater detail, highlighting our current knowledge about these botanicals, but also the enormous gaps in our knowledge, most notably as it relates to the species' toxicology, the pharmacokinetics of its active constituents and their metabolism.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 647 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Mexico 13 2%
Indonesia 2 <1%
Spain 2 <1%
Brazil 2 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Philippines 1 <1%
Peru 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Other 5 <1%
Unknown 618 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 88 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 78 12%
Student > Bachelor 71 11%
Researcher 59 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 48 7%
Other 114 18%
Unknown 189 29%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 128 20%
Chemistry 96 15%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 48 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 45 7%
Medicine and Dentistry 39 6%
Other 77 12%
Unknown 214 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 July 2026.
All research outputs
#2,496,743
of 33,732,945 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Ethnopharmacology
#514
of 9,182 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,697
of 96,467 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Ethnopharmacology
#5
of 39 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 33,732,945 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,182 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 96,467 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 39 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.