↓ Skip to main content
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (73rd percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
2 policy sources
twitter
24 X users

Readers on

mendeley
148 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Best practice perioperative strategies and surgical techniques for preventing caesarean section surgical site infections: a systematic review of reviews and meta‐analyses
Published in
British Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, February 2018
DOI 10.1111/1471-0528.15125
Pubmed ID
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 24 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 148 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 148 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 20 14%
Researcher 15 10%
Student > Master 13 9%
Student > Postgraduate 11 7%
Other 7 5%
Other 23 16%
Unknown 59 40%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 47 32%
Nursing and Health Professions 14 9%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 9 6%
Social Sciences 3 2%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 1%
Other 9 6%
Unknown 64 43%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 March 2021.
All research outputs
#2,380,231
of 34,411,289 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology
#920
of 8,294 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#38,595
of 373,140 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology
#17
of 63 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,411,289 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,294 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 373,140 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 63 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.