You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
Attention over time
Attention Score history
Activity
X Demographics
Mendeley demographics
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
ACC/AATS/AHA/ASE/EACTS/HVS/SCA/SCAI/SCCT/SCMR/STS 2017 Appropriate use criteria for the treatment of patients with severe aortic stenosis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery, January 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1093/ejcts/ezx389 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Aortic Stenosis Writing Group, Robert O Bonow, Alan S Brown, Linda D Gillam, Samir R Kapadia, Clifford J Kavinsky, Brian R Lindman, Michael J Mack, Vinod H Thourani, Aortic Stenosis Rating Panel, Gregory J Dehmer, Robert O Bonow, Brian R Lindman, Thomas M Beaver, Steven M Bradley, Blase A Carabello, Milind Y Desai, Isaac George, Philip Green, David R Holmes, Douglas Johnston, Jonathon Leipsic, Stephanie L Mick, Jonathan J Passeri, Robert N Piana, Nathaniel Reichek, Carlos E Ruiz, Cynthia C Taub, James D Thomas, Zoltan G Turi, Appropriate Use Criteria Task Force, John U Doherty, Gregory J Dehmer, Steven R Bailey, Nicole M Bhave, Alan S Brown, Stacie L Daugherty, Larry S Dean, Milind Y Desai, Claire S Duvernoy, Linda D Gillam, Robert C Hendel, Christopher M Kramer, Bruce D Lindsay, Warren J Manning, Praveen Mehrotra, Manesh R Patel, Ritu Sachdeva, L Samuel Wann, David E Winchester, Joseph M Allen |
Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 29% |
| India | 1 | 14% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 14% |
| France | 1 | 14% |
| Spain | 1 | 14% |
| United States | 1 | 14% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 43% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 29% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 29% |
Mendeley demographics
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 30 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 30 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 3 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 10% |
| Researcher | 3 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 7% |
| Other | 5 | 17% |
| Unknown | 12 | 40% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 14 | 47% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 3% |
| Social Sciences | 1 | 3% |
| Engineering | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 13 | 43% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 January 2018.
All research outputs
#9,387,729
of 29,965,814 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery
#1,416
of 4,602 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#155,343
of 482,038 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery
#19
of 70 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 29,965,814 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,602 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 482,038 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 70 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.