↓ Skip to main content

Comparison of the Produced and Perceived Voice Range Profiles in Untrained and Trained Classical Singers

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Voice, December 2005
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
7 Wikipedia pages

Readers on

mendeley
78 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Comparison of the Produced and Perceived Voice Range Profiles in Untrained and Trained Classical Singers
Published in
Journal of Voice, December 2005
DOI 10.1016/j.jvoice.2005.08.009
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Frequency and intensity ranges (in true decibel sound pressure level, 20 microPa at 1 m) of voice production in trained and untrained vocalists were compared with the perceived dynamic range (phons) and units of loudness (sones) of the ear. Results were reported in terms of standard voice range profiles (VRPs), perceived VRPs (as predicted by accepted measures of auditory sensitivities), and a new metric labeled as an overall perceptual level construct. Trained classical singers made use of the most sensitive part of the hearing range (around 3-4 kHz) through the use of the singer's formant. When mapped onto the contours of equal loudness (depicting nonuniform spectral and dynamic sensitivities of the auditory system), the formant is perceived at an even higher sound level, as measured in phons, than a flat or A-weighted spectrum would indicate. The contributions of effects like the singer's formant and the sensitivities of the auditory system helped the trained singers produce 20% to 40% more units of loudness, as measured in sones, than the untrained singers. Trained male vocalists had a maximum overall perceptual level construct that was 40% higher than the untrained male vocalists. Although the A-weighted spectrum (commonly used in VRP measurement) is a reasonable first-order approximation of auditory sensitivities, it misrepresents the most salient part of the sensitivities (where the singer's formant is found) by nearly 10 dB.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 78 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Ireland 1 1%
Spain 1 1%
Canada 1 1%
Unknown 75 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 19 24%
Researcher 12 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 9%
Professor 5 6%
Other 11 14%
Unknown 13 17%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 21 27%
Arts and Humanities 9 12%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 9%
Computer Science 5 6%
Linguistics 4 5%
Other 17 22%
Unknown 15 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 August 2025.
All research outputs
#8,534,976
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Voice
#406
of 2,243 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#41,771
of 160,387 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Voice
#7
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,243 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 160,387 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.