↓ Skip to main content

Natural products as targeted modulators of the nuclear factor-κB pathway

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Pharmacy & Pharmacology, April 2002
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (86th percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
12 patents
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Readers on

mendeley
140 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Natural products as targeted modulators of the nuclear factor-κB pathway
Published in
Journal of Pharmacy & Pharmacology, April 2002
DOI 10.1211/0022357021778637
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

The use of plant extracts to alleviate inflammatory diseases is centuries old and continues to this day. This review assesses the current understanding of the use of such plants and natural products isolated from them in terms of their action against the ubiquitous transcription factor, nuclear factor kappa B (NF-kappaB). As an activator of many pro-inflammatory cytokines and inflammatory processes the modulation of the NF-kappaB transduction pathway is a principal target to alleviate the symptoms of such diseases as arthritis, inflammatory bowel disease and asthma. Two pathways of NF-kappaB activation will first be summarised, leading to the IKK (IkappaB kinase) complex, that subsequently initiates phosphorylation of the NF-kappaB inhibitory protein (IKB). Natural products and some extracts are reviewed and assessed for their activity and potency as NF-kappaB inhibitors. A large number of compounds are currently known as NF-kappaB modulators and include the isoprenoids, most notably kaurene diterpenoids and members of the sesquiterpene lactones class, several phenolics including curcumin and flavonoids such as silybin. Additional data on cellular toxicity are also highlighted as an exclusion principle for pursuing such compounds in clinical development. In addition, where enough data exists some conclusions on structure-activity relationship are provided.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 140 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
China 1 <1%
Unknown 137 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 19 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 11%
Student > Bachelor 13 9%
Researcher 13 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 8%
Other 31 22%
Unknown 37 26%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 24 17%
Medicine and Dentistry 19 14%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 17 12%
Chemistry 14 10%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 9 6%
Other 17 12%
Unknown 40 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 December 2021.
All research outputs
#2,977,124
of 33,953,699 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Pharmacy & Pharmacology
#105
of 4,157 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,856
of 176,446 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Pharmacy & Pharmacology
#2
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 33,953,699 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,157 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 176,446 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.